The Rubinstein Law Firm Logo

For Legal Help, Call
248-220-1415

COVID-19 ANNOUNCEMENT: The Rubinstein Law Firm is dedicated to helping you with your legal needs during these challenging times. We can meet with you virtually (Skype, FaceTime, etc.), or by telephone.

The Rubinstein Law Firm Logo

For Legal Help, Call
248-220-1415

COVID-19 ANNOUNCEMENT: The Rubinstein Law Firm is dedicated to helping you with your legal needs during these challenging times. We can meet with you virtually (Skype, FaceTime, etc.), or by telephone.

Can a non-compete agreement be invalid?

| May 20, 2019 | Uncategorized

The legality of a non-compete clause can be tricky. Companies use them to prevent employees from going to work with the competition and they will usually bar an employee from taking work with a competitor within a specific geographical area. However, courts carefully scrutinize non-compete clauses, and a Michigan judge may rule that the clause is unenforceable if it runs afoul of a number of standards.

Per Chron.com, non-compete clauses are valid when they protect the legitimate business interests of a company. Over the course of employment, a worker may establish relationships with clients who do business with the worker’s company. If the employee should go independent, a non-compete clause can forbid the employee from using those client relationships for his or her own business benefit. However, courts may find problems if a non-compete does not appear to have any legitimate business interest for existing.

Another problem non-competes run into is how reasonable their restrictions are. A non-compete clause restricts a person’s ability to find work and in many cases within a specific geographic location. Courts are unlikely to uphold these requirements if they are unreasonably burdensome on the employee. A judge may strike down a non-compete clause that restricts a worker’s employment options indefinitely, or if the clause applies to a geographical area outside where the company conducts business.

Bad timing can also derail a non-compete clause. Judges may decide not to recognize a non-compete clause if an employee signs it after being employed for a time. Usually, a non-compete agreement has value to an employee because agreeing to it helped grant that person employment in the first place. But if an employee signs a non-compete after employment is established, a company should give that employee added benefit for doing so.

Some states, like Oklahoma and California, outright ban companies from using non-compete agreements. Michigan, however, is not one of them. This means Michigan businesses are able to compose non-compete clauses that can stand up in court. Consulting with an attorney to make sure the non-compete is likely to pass muster in court can help increase the chances that a company’s non-compete clauses will be legally preserved.

This article is meant to educate readers on business and commercial law. It is not written to provide legal advice.

Share This